Tanzania’s diverse methods of housing microfinance

A few weeks ago I was in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and met with local experts in affordable housing and housing microfinance. No two meetings were alike and some were actually a bit contradicting. Let me take you through:

WAT Human Settlement Trust

My first meeting was with Ayubu Mbwambo from WAT Human Settlement Trust.  WAT-HST has an overall goal is to assist low and middle income groups, particularly women to have access to adequate and affordable housing and secure tenure. They work in jointly with WAT-SACCOS, whose objective is to improve the standard of living of its members; provide varied financial services to members as per their needs and encourage more members to join the SACCOS. Over the past few years, WAT has used 3 different HMF. Initially, they established a Shelter Loan Revolving Fund (SLRF) that worked with small groups of low and middle income households, particularly woman, who would together take loans for the same amount. WAT received land from the government and would sell it to the members by giving them loans, and would offer housing support services.  WAT then decided to continue with the group loan model and applied for a three-year HMF pilot project. Using FSDT (Financial Sector Development Trust, Tanzania) as the guarantor to secure loans, WAT would first purchase land, then design a layout for the subdivision, get borrowers, then incrementally build depending on the borrower’s ability to pay. Borrowers would be part of the development before the start of construction. Most recently, in December 2012, WAT started to work with the CLIFF program, which enabled WAT-HST to purchase land and construct a core home, then sell the final product a borrower.

In all three of WAT’s models thus far, they have created a program and a market, by targeting specific neighbourhoods. The loans have been given to borrowers who are or will be living on WAT property, and whose homes will be built incrementally through technical construction support from WAT.

As WAT continues to grow and efforts are made to address housing needs of low income households in the region through loans as well as housing construction, there are some hurdles which they face.

  • Affordability of loans – while the demand for housing loans is high among WAT members who have been saving towards this goal for some time, it has been challenging to keep the interest rates low enough to make such loans affordable to these members, whose incomes are low
  • Construction costs – while WAT is beginning to build more units to achieve a better economy of scale, unprecedented inflation of building material costs as well as poor transportation infrastructure has made housing more expensive, creating budgetary challenges
  • Government barriers – construction and planning approvals processes can be cumbersome, requiring additional staff resources, time and money, which is particularly challenging when there are expectations from borrowers and funding partners.

National Housing Corporation Tanzania

no.1Later that day I met with the Mr. Hermes Mutagwaba of the National Housing Corporation, an organization under the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Settlement Development, whose goal is to provide and facilitate the provision of quality housing and other buildings for use by the general public while operating on sound commercial principles He believes that Tanzania does not have an ‘HMF’ product, but that people are using personal loans towards housing – however this is very expensive for low income earners, he argues.  He tells me that home ownership is ingrained in the Tanzanian culture, and is part of achieving one’s ‘manhood’. This provides some explanation as to why there are unplanned settlements in the country, and why people would rather live informally than with their parents or in-laws. While there is strong political support for HMF as a poverty alleviation strategy, the government has not been able to respond to the growing housing needs fast enough. Mr. Mutagwaba suggests that HMF should be initiated by the government to set an example and stimulate the HMF product, which later then can be accessed by the private market. As such, he thinks that the role of the HMF lender, public or private sector should be to:

  • Make loans affordable
  • Encourage group loans: this adds peer pressure and decreases default rates. Mr. Mutagwaba estimates that group loan default rates are not more than 5%
  • Understand cost of HSS before including it in the HMF product as these costs get carried to the borrower and impacts loan affordability
  • Incorporate a method of monitoring how funds are being used to ensure that they are being used for housing and not for other things (school fees; marriage; funerals etc.). This is easier when homes are closer together such as WAT’s housing development.

Selfina

Selfina is an MFI that has been working with women to provide micro-loans for small business as well as providing education and training around HIV/AIDS and paralegal issues around housing tenure. Dr. Victoria Kisyombe who heads the organization is interested in developing an HMF product for her clients, so that woman have greater rights to their home.  There are two streams of HMF that Selfina is interested in. The first stream is where the finance would go towards settling the legal rights of the home. There is a high demand for this and Selfina has already established a connection with that market. The legal process takes only about a month, and therefore this could be a quick turnaround for an affordable lending product. The second stream that interests Selfina is a type of lease-to-own model. They are looking to find a partner who would go into the actual construction of low cost houses.  Selfina would then lease these houses to the women who, after certain payment milestones had been reached, would ultimately become the title holders. Sefina is very much at the early conceptual stages of exploring the HMF product, but thus far their loans have gone to about 30,000 women, and training has been given to thousands.  This would be their starting market for HMF.

In order to develop an HMF program, Dr. Victoria Kisyombe understands that there are key matters that need to be addressed early on.

  • Capital finance and seed funding is needed to kick start the program. This will require finding the appropriate funding organizations, both local and international, who will not only provide financial assistance but also financial education on HMF business models.
  • Technology to administer and track loans as well as training around this software is needed to monitor the HMF loans and borrowers.
  • Government support is needed in accessing land for new housing construction as land is scarce and expensive
  • Appropriate and knowledgeable management staff will be required to supervise the HMF program

Tujikomboe Microfinance Company

Boaz Ackimu is the manager of Tujikomboe Microfinance Company, a newly developed HMF provider who had started up with no financial support from outside sources, though are now looking for funding so they may grow. They have nearly 100 clients who came to them through word of mouth and through a flyer distributing marketing campaign that they ran at the central bus area in Mbgala, a neighbourhood in Dar es Salaam.  Mbagala was chosen because of its over 3000 population and because there are all levels of homes present: new, old and under construction – this allows for mixed HMF types and develops a more diverse portfolio. While Tujikomboe’s clients are of mixed incomes, about 95% are of low income.  Mr. Ackimu recognizes that there is a need to address the needs of middle income earners who are being left out. Tujikomboe does not provide any housing support services (HSS) as this would increase the cost of the loans to the borrowers – however they would consider working with local university students who may be willing to donate their time to gain experience, and may motivate borrowers to learn about good construction practices. In order to verify that loans are being used for housing, Tujikomboe takes before and after pictures of the home. In addition, they will decrease the monthly interest rates if the borrower proves that the loan is being used for housing – this encourages the borrower to not only use the loan for housing, but also to build quickly.

Tujikomboe’s model has been successful thus far, its expansion will have to overcome internal and external concerns

  • External – Tujikomboe has been working fairly independently so far and wants to partner with related organizations in order to gain funding to grow as well as build connections to build capacity and advance their business.
  • Internal – currently there are 8 staff members on the Tujikomboe team and for it to grow, additional staff are needed, which is a challenge.

Bank of Tanzania

no.2The Mortgage Finance Specialist at the Bank of Tanzania does not recognize any of the housing initiatives in Tanzania as what he considers as housing microfinance. Instead, he looks to South America as a leading example of how to provide HMF. He will be approaching the government with a report on HMF completed earlier this year on the viability and demand for HMF in Tanzania, and believes that the public sector should lead the way with stimulating this market. The key challenge is how to use the funds in a sustainable way while addressing the housing needs across different income groups.

Ardhi University

no.3Professor Lussuga Kironde of Ardhi University has many years of experience in researching housing finance in the country. There is a long history of SACCOs in Tanzania and of micro loans – as long term large loans are considered to be too risky by both lenders and borrowers as the mortgage market in Tanzania has been under-developed. Therefore, he told me, there will be a very small if any market for large housing loans in the country, and there is a large demand for HMF. To facilitate my research in tracking HMF, Professor Kironde said that I ought to begin with the finished housing product, and approach the homeowner to understand how they financed their home, as opposed to the lender, as they cannot be certain how the loans were used, and there are lenders who don’t know that the loans are being used for homes. According to Professor Kironde, HMF should be where:

  • Borrower is able to repay loan
  • Some form of collateral needs to be established – Without collateral there is no incentive to repay the loan or use it for housing
  • There is the opportunity for financial literacy – Some borrowers don’t differentiate between a loan and their income. They think of the loan as free money and don’t pay it back. However, it is not up to the lender to provide basic financial literacy in regards to saving and borrowing, this should be ingrained in culture; and for this there needs to be a change at the national level, through schools, local business educators, and perhaps others.
  • The lender does have more than just a finance role when it comes to HMF.  That is to build capacity of borrower by making borrower understand the HMF product and the program so that loans are used appropriately and repaid.
  • The target market may be whomever the lender and their business model dictates. While some lenders focus on low income as their mission, using the full market and its range of income levels, would reduce risk and create opportunities for cross subsidies.
  • There is a regulatory framework that supports the delivery of HMF in a viable way while also helping people climb the economic ladder. However, there are currently too many barriers that make both HMF and housing unaffordable. This includes planning barriers (minimum lot size is large and unaffordable to many) and administrative barriers (inefficiencies in government programming and unnecessary admin costs).

So how does HMF work again?

no.4After my 6 meetings, I left Dar es Salaam confused and overwhelmed. Everyone I spoke with had a different way of approaching HMF as well as different target markets. I left with a few questions, but after giving it some time, I have found some answers that can direct me forward:

  • Is it ok that HMF is being implemented in different ways, or should it be streamlined?
    HMF has been going on for a long time, just not under the ‘HMF’ label. Under this new label in Africa, I think all of the approaches should be considered as we are still trying to figure out what works best where, and how to create appropriate products depending on the organizations mandate and target.
  • Is HSS part of HMF or a by-product?
    I think HSS is a by-product of HMF. However, because the market is not building homes, HSS as demonstrated by WAT’s development, is filling this gap so that HMF can happen. Also, HSS is not necessary construction support, but can also be the policy and research supporting HMF such as the work from the Bank of Tanzania and the National Housing Corporation.
  • Who should champion HMF – the public or private sector?
    Perhaps a bit cynical, but I don’t think we can depend on either to fully ‘champion’ HMF and both need to work together. In the context of HMF, the public sector can facilitate: Financial literacy, planning and building legislation, policies and support, providing access to utilities and services, affordable land distribution and infrastructure improvements. The private sector may work better in construction, community development and HMF product (loan) distribution.
  • In my research of developing a method to track ‘evidence of HMF’ do I include all types of HMF them? And if so, do I start from the lender or from the homeowner as Professor Lussuga Kironde recommends?
    At this point all types of HMF (HSS driven, policy driven, and finance driven) should be included so that they may realize that they are actually on the same page and are mutually enforcing. I’ve been looking at tracking from the lending side, however at a community level, it would be useful to understand from the borrowers side how they have financed the incremental building of their home. This would help to clarify the correlation between microfinance and housing development.

So what does this all mean for HMF researchers and practitioners? There is a need for us to work together and share resources, challenges and accomplishments. CAHF is a useful source to collect and distribute this information and help HMF providers connect with relevant experts and partners. As someone who isn’t working on the ground in construction or actually distributing the loans, we have a unique birds-eye view of all the different HMF features and are beginning to see how they are inter-related.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One response to “Tanzania’s diverse methods of housing microfinance

  1. What an interesting and candid observation. The main reason for these divergent views stem from the fact housing was never an agenda. Individuals (NGOs) took interest in the subject from either abroad experiences or as agents for foreign firms wishing to help. Ardhi University provides a more practical and researched views on the subject

Loading...