Exploring New Build for Very Low Income Earners: Ground Plus 4 Block Typologies
How can we design affordable, scalable, and livable housing for very low-income earners? This blog delves into Ground Plus 4 block typologies that balance density, cost efficiency, and community needs. We explore three models: bedsits with shared facilities, self-contained bedsits, and a mix of self-contained bedsits, one-bed, and two-bed units to cater to diverse household structures. In our estimation, we can deliver these typologies at under KES 30,000 per square meter on Gross Built-Up Area.
Attached are architectural designs, structural designs, and cost estimates for each block typology, along with a financial model to test their feasibility. These open-source files allow investors, developers, and policymakers to explore the potential of such investments and drive scalable solutions for affordable housing. Dive into the details and be part of the conversation on the future of inclusive urban living and help us answer the following questions:
- For Shared Facilities Bedsits – How much sharing is too much?
- For Self-Contained Bedsits – Does privacy come at a cost?
- For mixed Unit Development – Can a blend of 1-beds, 2-beds, and bedsits be the answer?
- Beyond the blueprints, what’s the most cost-effective way to build? Can we ensure safety without breaking budgets? And which model offers better returns — shared or self-contained living?
Join us as we rethink the future of slum upgrading — where housing must grow up without growing apart
TYPOLOGY 1, 2 AND 3 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TYPOLOGY 1_SHARED FACILITIES_MATERIALS & LABOR SCHEDULE TYPOLOGY 1_SHARED FACILITIES_MATERIALS & LABOR SCHEDULE TYPOLOGY 2_SELF CONTAINED_STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TYPOLOGY 2_SELF CONTAINED_MATERIALS & LABOR SCHEDULE TYPOLOGY 3 STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TYPOLOGY 3_STUDIO,1,2 UNITS_MATERIAL AND LABOR SCHEDULE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY MODEL FOR G+4 BLOCKS